N_Lens 4 hours ago

Quite a decisive move by the Australian government. I don't know if it's a move in the right direction or not but the research clearly shows that around the time social media became mainstream, teens' and preteens' mental health took a nosedive (Especially girls).

  • hallole 3 hours ago

    Hugely decisive! Feels more like a policy for idyllic hypotheticals. "Suppose we could ban social media..." well, hey, they actually did it.

    I'm very interested to see how their socializing evolves in response to such a shock. Do the social behaviors of pre-internet times re-emerge? "Third spaces" reappear overnight? We shall see!

    • rainonmoon an hour ago

      Given that “social media” is in fact not banned and all this does is impact a select (and frankly logically inconsistent) list of services, this seems very unlikely. Children are still free to be groomed and gamble on Roblox and join servers belonging to The Com on Discord. To be clear I don’t think those services should be regulated by this obscene law either but this isn’t going to bring back any kind of halcyon era for kids. It will expand the surveillance of and shame around young people’s internet use, however.

      • anakaine a few seconds ago

        How so? It has been implemented so that age verification is a token only, a yes/no authorisation. The age verification service doesnt get browsing details, and the site providing content doesnt get any additional user details beyond what they would likely already have, including those subject to PII legislation.

    • protocolture 2 hours ago

      >well, hey, they actually did it.

      They passed legislation, its not clear at all that they succeeded.

about3fitty 5 hours ago

Besides this being ineffective for the motivated, it might have a subtle antitrust effect.

As kids find alternative platforms, perhaps they will be vendor locked to them instead of the Meta empire.

deminature 3 hours ago

As an Australian experiencing this first hand and considerably older than 16, absolutely nothing has changed. It seems like all the social networks are doing age estimation of accounts and only taking action on those that fail and are detected as underage. The change is otherwise completely invisible if you're an adult user. Obviously I'm only a sample size of 1, but I've not heard of any other adults being adversely affected by this, so it seems the estimation is accurate.

Pretty well executed - I'm impressed. Given how seamlessly this occurred, it will undoubtedly be rolled out in Europe next year, as the EU has expressed an interest in doing so, but was waiting to see how the implementation went in Australia.

  • bigfatkitten 2 hours ago

    Nothing has changed for my 15 year old either. It’s business as usual today for her.

    She says only one of her friends has been challenged by a platform so far, and that was by Snapchat. That friend got another 14 year old friend to pass the facial age detection check on her behalf.

  • protocolture 2 hours ago

    >Pretty well executed - I'm impressed.

    It seems like a handful of sites havent even switched over. Most are just estimating. Theres no clear indication that the execution has been anything but botched, unless convenience for older people was the only metric.

    • rainonmoon an hour ago

      The government have previously stated they won’t pursue breaches unless they’re particularly egregious anyway so this is basically shameless political theatre.

      • protocolture an hour ago

        ABC did a poll of a large number of kids affected by this, and only 6% estimated the legislation would be successful.

  • NoPicklez 3 hours ago

    Pretty much aligns with how I have felt it here in Aus as well

falaki 3 hours ago

I really hope other nations, including the United States, copy this. Australia proved that it is possible. I think the results will be so overwhelmingly positive that others will take notice. Good job Australia!

Reading "Anxious Generation" is a must for all parents in this day and age.

  • AngryData 3 hours ago

    Isn't it a little early to declare success? I think the bigger worry with the US though is not whether it is technically possible, but whether anyone in power cares to actually help kids versus using this it as an excuse to implement Orwellian surveillance upon citizens.

    • anakaine 4 minutes ago

      Surveillance could be part of it, if you let it be. Improved mental health, education, and social outcomes for each generation is also pretty darned important.

  • protocolture 2 hours ago

    While I am definitely in favor of the US causing itself more damage, its actually quite sickening to see people spruiking this legislation.

    First of all, Australia has proven nothing, kids are stepping politely over this barrier without issue.

    Second we are already hearing from disabled teens losing their only social lifeline.

    Congratulations, you have isolated and disenfranchised a bunch of kids.

    • anakaine 3 minutes ago

      The changes are not even 12 hours old for most of Australia and people are declaring failure. Far out.

  • Cpoll 2 hours ago

    > Reading "Anxious Generation" is a must for all parents in this day and age.

    Great, another Oprah's book club book that assures parents that there's just one easy trick to saving your children.

  • tartoran 3 hours ago

    Of course it is possible, why would it not? I'm glad this is happening and I'm sure it'll follow in other countries, probably not the in the US though. Frankly I really hope most people just get off social media's grip and start interacting the way we used to.

protocolture 2 hours ago

Its crazy how the AusGov has just tried to turn this into some kind of nationalistic celebration. Passing laws isolating children isnt to be celebrated by lighting up national monuments.

  • batiudrami 3 minutes ago

    Isolating children? They’re schoolchildren! They see their peers at school every day.